PIPages
Labs

Kirk Lohmueller

University of California-Los Angeles, CA·Genetics

Most new mutations that matter for health are harmful, yet how these deleterious mutations shape evolution and complex traits such as disease risk is still unclear. A key quantity is the distribution of fitness effects (DFE), a summary of how strongly natural selection acts against new mutations, from nearly harmless to severely damaging.

Fields

Genetics

Ecology & Evolution

Computer Science

Topics

population genetics

population genomics

deleterious mutations

Grants
1 known grant, through May 2027

What they work on

  1. Infer the distribution of fitness effects for noncoding regulatory mutations by combining large-scale functional genomic data with polymorphism data, since most disease-associated variants fall outside protein-coding genes.
  2. Develop new computational approaches to infer fitness effects of complex mutations such as short tandem repeats and copy number variants, enabling direct comparison of how harmful different mutation types are.
  3. Test how population size, organismal complexity and lifespan influence the distribution of fitness effects, by comparing polymorphism data from multiple species.
  4. Test the lab's previously developed model for the existence of dominance, using human polymorphism data and yeast functional genomic data, where dominance describes whether one mutated copy of a gene is enough to matter.
  5. Use detailed forward simulations to establish whether population genetic models combining multiple evolutionary forces simultaneously can explain observed genetic variation across genomes.

More about the research

Knowing the DFE helps explain why genomes vary the way they do, and it helps researchers tell disease-causing variants apart from harmless ones.

Why it matters

A major hurdle in finding genes behind complex diseases is separating variants that disrupt biological function from harmless ones. Evolutionary information is routinely used to rank candidate variants or to model background genetic variation. By clarifying how different kinds of harmful mutations behave, including noncoding and structural ones, this work could make those evolutionary tools more useful for identifying biologically relevant and pathogenic variants.

Known grants

From NIH and NSF research grants. Labs often have other funding we can't see.

Population genomics of the selective effects of new mutations

NIH · Sep 2016 – May 2027

Closest labs

Xinjun Zhang

University of Michigan, MI·Genetics

Develop machine learning methods to detect archaic introgression from unknown 'ghost' archaic humans in East Asian genomes.

Kerry Geiler-Samerotte

Arizona State University Campus Immersion, AZ·Ecology & Evolution·Early-career

Evolve thousands of DNA-barcoded yeast lineages across subtly different temperatures to measure how the genetic basis of adaptation and the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) shift along the gradient.

Lena Hileman

University of Kansas, KS·Ecology & Evolution

Confirm about twenty genomic regions that distinguish bee- from hummingbird-pollinated Penstemon species, using genome-wide association mapping to link them to floral syndrome traits.

The school

University of California-Los Angeles: 84 labs on PI Pages, $1.9B a year on research, 803 research doctorates a year.

More about University of California-Los Angeles

Reach out

A start for your email. Fill in the brackets.