Sherri Rose
Stanford University, CA·Mathematics & Statistics
Computer algorithms now help decide who gets which health care, yet few are checked for their effects on patients once they are in use. Some have already caused harm.
- Fields
Mathematics & Statistics
Public Health & Epidemiology
Computer Science
- Topics
health care algorithms
machine learning
artificial intelligence
- Grants
- 2 known grants, through Jul 2027
What they work on
- Develop microsimulation models of the health care system's cause-and-effect network to estimate how an algorithm would affect access, quality and costs before deployment, using billing claims, primary care records and qualitative data.
- Build simpler causal network models and Markov cohort models, which track patient groups between health states, as comparison benchmarks for the pre-deployment impact framework.
- Develop and test data intervention methods that use microsimulations to generate counterfactual outcomes, meaning what results would look like under a desired state of primary care.
- Create penalized regression estimators, prediction methods that use penalties to enforce chosen constraints, and compare them with existing estimators in comprehensive simulation studies.
- Test the combined framework on chronic kidney disease quality of care using national primary care registry data, and release open-source tools, tutorials and a synthetic dataset.
More about the research
The two projects here ask how algorithms can be tested before they are deployed, and how to build better ones for primary care, where most tools trained on hospital data do not fit well.
Why it matters
Algorithms already shape care for millions of people. A way to test their effects on access, quality and cost before deployment could help health systems avoid tools that harm patients, and could inform future standards for health AI. Primary care tools tested on chronic kidney disease care could improve care quality for patients with this common condition, and open software could let other clinics adapt the methods.
Known grants
From NIH and NSF research grants. Labs often have other funding we can't see.
Closest labs
Pragya Kakani
Weill Medical College of Cornell University, NY·Public Health & Epidemiology·Early-career
Compare the neighborhoods, primary care providers and older adult patients of retailer-owned primary care clinics (such as those owned by CVS, Walgreens, Walmart and Amazon) with other practices to identify implications for access and quality.
John Mafi
University of California-Los Angeles, CA·Medicine & Clinical Research
Build governance and infrastructure for rapid, reproducible evaluation of AI clinical decision-support tools for dementia, using UC Health Data Warehouse EHR and imaging data and the ATLAS genotyped biobank.
Nina Bickell
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY·Public Health & Epidemiology
Use NYC-wide visit data on 12 million patients to describe how mixed or uniform outpatient practices are by insurance and other factors, and test links to quality measures in pediatric preventive care, obstetric procedures and chronic disease management.
The school
Stanford University: 87 labs on PI Pages, $1.6B a year on research, 739 research doctorates a year.
Reach out
A start for your email. Fill in the brackets.