PIPages
Labs

Christopher Cascio

University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI·Neuroscience

Feeling connected to other people matters for health, and it matters most during adolescence, when peer relationships take on outsized importance. Social media is now a main channel for those relationships: most teenagers use more than one platform and nearly all go online daily.

Fields

Neuroscience

Psychology

Public Health & Epidemiology

Topics

adolescence

social media

technology and digital media

Grants
1 known grant, through Aug 2027

What they work on

  1. Test whether greater exposure to social media features signaling connection — likes, comments, friends and followers — sensitizes adolescents to social feedback, measured as heightened brain reactivity to social inclusion and exclusion with functional MRI.
  2. Track how neural reactivity to social inclusion and exclusion changes across the transition from middle school to high school, a period of shifting peer ties and increased risk-taking.
  3. Relate longitudinal measures of social media exposure and neural reactivity to adolescents' health and risk behaviors and well-being, using outcome data from companion projects in the larger study.
  4. Identify strengths as well as deficits of social media use by testing whether sensitized adolescents benefit more from experiences of social inclusion, not only suffer more from exclusion.

More about the research

Whether this helps or harms well-being is genuinely unsettled — reviews find positive, negative and null results. One reason for the mixed picture may be that effects depend on how a teen uses these platforms and on how sensitive that teen has become to social feedback.

Why it matters

Adolescents spend much of their social life online, and parents, schools and clinicians lack evidence on which patterns of use help and which harm. By identifying whether sensitivity to social feedback explains why the same platforms benefit some teens and hurt others, this work could point toward concrete guidance on steering young people toward forms of online engagement linked to better well-being and healthier behavior, rather than blanket limits on screen time.

Known grants

From NIH and NSF research grants. Labs often have other funding we can't see.

Using functional magnetic resonance imaging to understand how positive and negative TDM experiences relate to mental and behavioral health

NIH · Sep 2022 – Aug 2027

Closest labs

William Mellick

Medical University of South Carolina, SC·Neuroscience·Early-career

Test whether parents with alcohol use disorder plus bipolar disorder and their unaffected teens show stronger brain responses to reward than AUD-only families, using fMRI during social reward and decision-making tasks.

Jasmin Cloutier

University of Delaware, DE·Psychology

Compare brain activity, measured with functional MRI, while people form first impressions of human versus artificial intelligence (AI) partners.

Madhukar Trivedi

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, TX·Medicine & Clinical Research

Investigate how the amount of social media use and positive or negative online experiences affect depression, anxiety and suicidal ideation trajectories over six months in 100 at-risk Texas youth.

The school

University of Wisconsin-Madison: 91 labs on PI Pages, $1.9B a year on research, 854 research doctorates a year.

More about University of Wisconsin-Madison

Reach out

A start for your email. Fill in the brackets.